Banana Shoes

by Mrs. Gunn

I think I like.

Moonlight Social – Case Study

by Mrs. Gunn

Moonlight Social is a band 9 months young, and has received a lot of attention recently for winning an award at SXSW as well as beating 100 bands in an Austin City battle of the bands. Their two person band has a rock/country feel, and they are completely DIY. They recently raised $15,000 on Kickstarter to create their first album.

The band consists of Jeremy Burchard and Jennica Scott. Jeremy just recently graduated from University of Texas with a major in writing and rhetoric and a minor in audio engineering. He was involved in GRAMMY U as an undergrad – an organization made up of college students looking to work and network in the music industry. That and his two internships at a record label and recording studio gave him the experience, knowledge, and contacts to be able to DIY. He recorded their first EP with his own equipment.

Below is an article from Hypebot about his DIY strategies and philosophies.

Trackback: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b36c69e2015437033c58970c

 

Indie Artists Moonlight Social on Kickstarter, DIY, & The New Music Industry

Up-and-coming Texas band Moonlight Social, has achieved a lot for a group that formed 10 months ago and has only released a single EP. They performed at SXSWselected by 9-time Grammy winner, Ray Benson and won a Grammy-sponsored showcase. The band also won the 2011 Austin Chronicle Sound Wars, beating 100 local bands.

Moonlight Social consists of Jeremy Burchard and Jennica Scott. Their music can be described as a mix of rock and country.

I recently interviewed Jeremy, guitarist and vocalist, of Moonlight Social on the band’s Kickstarter campaign, DIY, and things pertaining to the new music industry.

Natalie: Your band, Moonlight Social, recently started a campaign on Kickstarter. How is that campaign going so far and what do you hope to accomplish?

Jeremy: It’s going swimmingly! We set a goal of $15,000, knowing that after paying the Kickstarter and Amazon fees (5% and 3-5% accordingly) we could come out with about $13,500 if we hit our mark and that was almost exactly what the minimum budget would’ve been to make the album we wanted to make. We set a deadline of about 35 days, since longer campaigns reportedly don’t do as well and we actually needed the funding before January 1st. We weren’t positive if it’d work out or not, because that’s a lot of money to ask from people, but we hit the goal within the first 5 days, thanks in large part to larger donations. Now it’s exciting because the more we raise, the more freedom we have to really make this album incredible by hiring great studio musicians, doing custom art direction, getting it mastered at a great studio – stuff like that. Ultimately, we wanted to create excitement for this album by letting our fans know that they are directly contributing to its development and success. We want this to be in as many headphones and car speakers as possible!

Natalie: Why did the band decide to stay independent and what do you think of the music labels currently?

Jeremy: We decided to stay independent for the time being because that was the best decision for us. We sat down with our lawyer, who is really more like a friend at this point, and talked about the options. For where we are right now, it makes just as much sense to build our team and keep pushing things independent of a contract. For this album specifically, it allows us to record what we want to record, where we want to record it, and who we want to record it with. But, that doesn’t mean we don’t want to end up on a label. We certainly do. There are tons of great labels out there that understand the changing dynamic between what they offer bands and what bands offer in return. But at the core of it, there’s nothing magical about a label. It still all comes back to the product and if you offer something people want to hear. We’re building our fan base and building our name, and that’s important regardless of whether or not you’re on a label. We realized that the more we keep surrounding ourselves with inspiring, hard-working people, the more likely we are to be in a position that we don’t need a label. That’s when the labels with a great reputation for understanding the artists come knocking. With the help of our fans, we’re creating opportunities for ourselves so that more opportunities may come down the road.

Natalie: As a DIY band, what challenges have you faced? Any tips to other DIY artists?

Jeremy: Oh my. Well for starters, “do it yourself,” REALLY means you do it yourself! But, there are also varying degrees because nobody does it ALL by themselves. What it really means is deciding what your strengths are as a band, and where you know you could use help. For instance, we made our debut EP on a budget of $150 – all of which went to mastering because I have a background in engineering, have enough equipment, and wanted to take on the project independent of other people. We’re also pretty adept at the social media landscape, and I had a little experience putting together websites from prior internships. Booking shows is just a matter of networking and the right combination of phone calls and emails. We have photography friends who took pictures for us and I was able to secure a few hours of guidance from a PR firm and an entertainment lawyer (now our full-time lawyer) after bidding on the package at a local Recording Academy holiday party. However, we needed help getting our stuff out to blogs and other outlets for press and review and the “DIY” aspect of that comes down to you doing your own research and finding out where your music will fit in best. Really, this whole experience is a product of completely dropping your ego and learning every last thing you can from anybody kind and experienced enough to help. “DIY” doesn’t necessarily mean “free,” but be sure to utilize everything that is free. Reverbnation, Facebook, Twitter, etc. – the currency of the working artist is email addresses. Offer fans something interesting for email addresses, manage them well, and then send out emails when there’s something you really want your fans to know. Besides learning as much as you possibly can, the key to being DIY is not being afraid to ask for favors and offer whatever you can in return. You’ll be surprised how willing your friends are to help sell CD’s and merch at shows, put up fliers, talk to any contacts they have, etc. As a rule of thumb, if somebody wants to help us, I’ll be extremely grateful and say “yes” regardless if I think it’ll come through or not. Hundreds of people have said they’re going to do this or that for us. And I say “thanks, that’s amazing of you!” with a smile to everyone. How many come through? Certainly more than if I would’ve said “no thanks.”

Natalie: With the changes in the music industry, how are you connecting with fans and growing your fanbase?

Jeremy: Social media is huge, no question about it, but it shouldn’t be the only way you connect with people. Connect with them personally at shows. The day of the “mysterious artist” isn’t gone, but when you’re starting out making fans, it does a hell of a lot more to be approachable and relatable. Fans want to be a part of something. Let them know they are. As far as growing fans, every possible way you can get coverage on Internet radio or blogs is helpful. We went through A&R Select for some stuff. It’s been decent, but we’ve outgrown it. Still, it’s a model exemplifying how important it is to spread your music. We’ve offered free music for “likes” and whatnot. With the Kickstarter campaign, we’ve actually seen donations from new fans almost as much as donations from old fans and friends based on the fact that we’re offering something intimate. One thing we love to do is take suggestions on songs to cover at a show. For an upstart DIY band, it’s a realistic way to connect with fans. Down the road it may not be as simple, but the idea that you actively listen to your fans is what you’re really after. I always take a moment to handwrite a note to any place that’s given us coverage or radio play. I’ve also always made a point to thank and talk to every sound engineer or festival organizer on a personal level. Why? Because they’re fans too, just like I’m a fan, and they often deal in rather thankless positions. The industry is so wide open nowadays that artists have such great access to both their fans and big players in the industry. Let them know you appreciate them, and you’ll be a part of the successful minority.

Natalie: What do you think of social media: Facebook, Twitter, etc.?

Jeremy: I think it’s an incredible way to mobilize and connect with fans, but it’s not an end, it’s a means. You can be proactive and get 1,000 likes or followers in a month and still only play a show in front of 15 people. Yes, “likes” and “followers” are another form of currency for DIY bands, but it’s what you do with them that really counts. Be active on your Facebook and Twitter accounts and offer reasons for your fans to pay attention. We haven’t put much emphasis on Twitter, and we really should. Facebook has been a slow process. We’ve played to crowds bigger than our “like” count, but they’ll come. It’s a natural process as long as you offer something to people for visiting, such as updates and news. We’ve always used social media as a way to drive people to the website. That may change down the road and we may use social media as a more immediate means of contacting fans and leave the big stuff to the website. But regardless, we’ve always felt social media should subsidize your outreach efforts — not the other way around.

Natalie: With your involvement in SXSW, what have you learned and what trends do you see for the future of the music business?

Jeremy: My involvement with SXSW had a lot more to do with the technical aspects of things – stage sound, logistics, etc. But, I did organize a SXSW street team for a new music app that taught me a LOT about the music business. First of all, there’s no doubt the music business is supersaturated. And yet, even though it’s packed to the brim with artists, companies, apps, and business models, new ones enter the market every year, and SOMEWHERE there’s a desire for it. The bands and companies that find their audience are the ones that have success. Many times, that’s why they’ll head to SXSW. It does break my heart to see these small bands on an independent label that save up $14,000 to make the trip to Austin thinking they’re going to play a SXSW showcase, be discovered, and take off. Could it happen? Sure. But, you’re much better off spending that money and effort on controlling your region and finding your crowd. For Moonlight Social, we know that having a hold on Central Texas is important. We’re building our name in Central Texas and letting it spread. Luckily, we’re where SXSW is, but at the same time, we’re not saving up thousands of dollars to drive and do a showcase in New York. New York will come. For now, we’re dealing with Texas. Knowing who you want to reach is a huge part of the music business right now. The other thing I learned from working with and around SXSW is that innovation is everywhere — and your band needs to be a part of it. Embrace new concepts and ways to reach fans. Moonlight Social is going to be one of the spotlighted independent bands for the upstart app AudioVroom. We’re going to have our own profile so people can check out music related to us and we’re going to have a great new way to connect with fans. Us little guys are all trying to get somewhere. So why not get there together? Carpooling saves on gas!

Natalie: How do you discover new music?

Jeremy: Live shows is a great way! (Especially when we’re booked on a bill with somebody.) I love finding a cool new band because we’re playing a show with them. I also do use AudioVroom like I mentioned before. I’ll always check out other bands that get coverage in the same blogs and stuff we do. Radio is still very viable, especially in Austin. And of course, friend referrals. I can always count on Jennica (the other half of Moonlight Social) to stay up-to-date with new Texas music. Also, people love finding out other people love what they love. So if you love a young band (like us!), do them a favor and tell your friends! Music is both very personal and very communal. How cool is that!?

Natalie: What do you think of streaming services like Spotify?

Jeremy: Well, first of all I think Spotify is miles above the content stealing that was more prevalent in the mid-2000s, but I have differing opinions. I’ve used most of the various streaming services and found I generally respect the ones that help people discover music more. Yes, Spotify is convenient if you’re looking for that one particular song, but the business model still doesn’t pay artists nearly enough (we get .1 cents per stream – that’s 6,000 streams to make up the cost of a fan buying one EP). I could see Spotify compensating for that loss by making it incredibly easy for fans to also buy the album, merch, tickets to shows, and other ways that actually benefit the artist. But, people aren’t interacting with artists via Spotify and they’re not really discovering new artists so it doesn’t do much for the little guys. I think there’s definitely a place for them and that they’re an integral part of the new model, but it’s a little overblown. They aren’t revolutionizing the industry as much as some people hype – iTunes and the singles market revolutionized the industry. But, if a streaming service helps artists and fans interact and presents another avenue for fans to discover new music, well that would be quite beneficial.

Natalie: Do you think that artists should be giving away their music for free?

Jeremy: It should be up to them. But, in general, I don’t think you should undervalue the effort that goes into the music. It’s not just the artist, either. It’s everybody behind the artist, including engineers, producers, designers, etc. These people make their livelihoods by working on these projects. If it’s free, they have to start charging more upfront costs because they don’t get any back-end points. Yeah, the majority of income for an artist comes from merchandise and live shows, but it’s about more than just the artist. Of course, I presume this is talking just about electronic versions as well. Giving away the electronic version leads to a decline in physical sales, which is kind of a shame because it takes away from one of the most wholesome experiences of life — unwrapping that new CD and popping it in your CD player. People still buy and prefer CD’s, regardless of the ease of digital music. I’m afraid the idea of artists giving away digital versions of their music may be too tempting and really lead to a decline in the physical product. Some of the exciting things to see have been the “pay what you want” model showcased by a few bands and other cool ideas, but those are mostly done by bands with huge fan bases and a great history of physical sales (Nine Inch Nails, Radiohead, etc.). But like I said, as long as it’s the artist’s decision to give away their music and not a peer-to-peer service, well, this is America! Giving away a song or two as a part of a promotional deal is great and has worked for us, but the idea that media like music and movies should be free is really disappointing to me. Maybe you shouldn’t expect to pay for dine-in refills and parking on Sunday, but you should expect to pay for your music and movies. It sounds and looks better when you do. Try it!

Natalie: What are your long-term goals for the band?

Jeremy: We’d love to be nominated for a GRAMMY and be able to play our music all over the world, but those are just kind of by-products of the real goal, which is connecting with as many people as possible. Everybody has their own parameters for “success.” I’ve always personally believed that if you make enough money to play music as a living and call it your day job, then you’re pretty successful. But, for us it’s about having people hear the music. We make music we like, and we love the fact that other people like it as well. When we’re in the position to be able to play all around the world, that will be a pretty awesome thing. The most incredible thing to hear is when a fan comes up to you and says a song has helped them get through a tough time, or it “speaks” to them. It feeds you and inspires you even more. The accolades and peer recognition that follow are just icing on the cake.

To learn more about Moonlight Social, visit their website.

Hypebot contributor Natalie Cheng (@ncswim881) is the Music Think TankCommunity Manager. She is also a cellist and is working toward becoming a music marketer. (http://about.me/natalie.cheng88)

 



ComScore

Off

Ray LaMontagne Case Study

by Mrs. Gunn

Case Study:

Ray LaMontagne

In 1999, Ray LaMontagne quit his day job to pursue singing and songwriting as a career. He literally holed up and practiced. After a few failed gigs, he sought a vocal coach, and that’s when his career took off. Though still popular, his popularity most likely peaked at the Bonaroo Fest where he broke out in 2005. A disdain for media and his own  artististic integrity keep him honest to himself. He currently lives on a farm in Maine with his wife and two children.

His website: http://www.raylamontagne.com/us/home

From WikiPedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_LaMontagne

LaMontagne was inspired to quit his job and start a career as a singer-songwriter after listening to Stephen Stills‘ song “Treetop Flyer” and the album Stills Alone. [9][10] He began performing in 1999, while maintaining a part time job as a tutor.[9] In the summer of 1999, LaMontagne recorded 10 songs for a demo album that he sent to various local music venues including Maine’s Oddfellow Theater, who hired him as the opening act for John Gorka and Jonathan Edwards. A business executive introduced him to Chrysalis Music Publishing who recorded LaMontagne’s first album, and sold it to RCA Records in the USA and Echo Records in the UK[11]

In 2004 LaMontagne recorded his album Trouble with producer Ethan Johns and released it on RCA Records. The album featured performances by Sara Watkins and Stephen Stills‘ daughter, Jennifer.[12] The album sold over 250,000 copies in the USA and 500,000 worldwide.[13][14][4] During a 2005 tour, LaMontagne performed on the TV show Austin City Limits.[15]

An EP of LaMontagne’s performance at the Bonnaroo Music Festival was released in 2005 and his song “All the Wild Horses” was part of the soundtrack for the TV series Rescue Me and the 2009 film The Boys Are Back. His song “Trouble” appeared in the TV series Alias and his song “Jolene” was heard in the 2010 film The Town. His song “Hold You in My Arms” was featured in the 2006 movie, She’s The Man.[16]

In 2005, he performed at two charity events, a NYC fundraiser for the victims of Hurricane Katrina and at the “Warren Haynes Christmas Jam”.[17] [18]

 

 

Off

Jaco Pastorius Wall

by Mrs. Gunn

Berklee Summer Program

by Mrs. Gunn

I would like to bring your attention to:

Berklee 5 Week Performance Summer Program – $7k, but you will come out a monster!   http://www.berklee.edu/summer/fiveweeksummer/program-like.php

 

 

Berklee Guitar Sessions – $1200, 1 week, Aug 19 – 24. Learn to play guitar. http://www.berklee.edu/summer/guitarsessions/program-like.php

 

 

Berklee Songwriting Workshop – $1300, 4 days, Aug 15 – 18. Get feedback on your original songs.  http://www.berklee.edu/summer/songwriting/program-like.php

 

Berklee Music Production Workshop – $1900 – July 13 – 15. Learn to record like a pro.  http://www.berklee.edu/summer/productionworkshop/program-like.php

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off

University of North Carolina School for the Arts

by Mrs. Gunn

 

 

 

 

 

University of North Carolina School for the Arts

This program has recently been placed on my radar – three times in the last few days, actually – as a great school for music, composition, and film studies.

They have three application deadlines: Dec, Jan, Feb.

They also have a high school division as well. Click on pic above for the link.

Off

Bernhoft

by Mrs. Gunn

From Wikipedia:

Jarle Bernhoft, also known as Bernhoft, is a Norwegian singer, multi-instrumentalist, composer and lyricist.[1] Bernhoft is from Nittedal in Norway, but currently lives in Oslo. His best known songs are “Streetlights”, “Shout”, “Choices” and “C’mon Talk”.

Bernhoft was vocalist and songwriter in the band Span. The band broke up in 2005. Previously, Bernhoft had played in the group Explicit Lyrics with Fridtjof ‘Joff’ Nilsen, who joined him in Span.

Bernhoft has contributed on a number of recordings and concerts with mostly Norwegian artists, such as Hanne Hukkelberg, Dadafon, Bigbang and The Køhn/Johansen Sextet. He played in the band Green Granadas using the stage name Rod Hot.

He released his first solo album “Ceramik City Chronicles” on September 1, 2008. In January 2010, Bernhoft released a double live album called “1:Man 2:Band”, where one half is a recording from his solo show at a jazz café in Oslo (Kampen Bistro), and the other half is a recording from his concerts in Rockefeller and Molde Jazz Festival with a full band.

His second solo album, “Solidarity Breaks”, was released the next year in January of 2011. It hit Norway’s top 30 album list in second place starting in February[2] and as of August had been in the number one spot for nine weeks.[3]

In September 2011, Bernhoft appeared on The Ellen Degeneres Show after producers of the show found his video on YouTube. While on the show he played his hit song C’mon Talk.[4]

His website:

http://www.bernhoft.org/

What’s interesting is his Terms and Conditions page. He has an entire web page devoted to legal speak.  Is he signed? He looks like it, but based on the name of his company, Jarle Bernhoft, which is listed under the terms and conditions of his website, I would say not. So he’s doing a great job at all the business stuff, too. Good music + good business skills = Successful artist.

http://www.bernhoft.org/TermsAndConditions.aspx

Off

Report Claims Major Labels To Phase Out CD, Abandon Retail By End Of 2012

by Mrs. Gunn

Reposted from HypeBot article,

Trackback:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b36c69e2015436b1d01f970c

Is it really  true? Yoo be the jdge!

article below:

*****************************************************************************

Major labels plan to phase out most physical CD’s by the end of 2012 according to Side Line Music Magazine citing multiple unnamed industry sources. Only premium CD’s would be manufactured according to the report; with most of those sales online rather than at brick and morter stores.  

COMMENTARY:

 

The demise of the CD would be catastrophic for what remains of music retail and severely hurt sales in some genres slow to adopt digital, like country. Which is why I an not buying this story.  Physical CD sales may be shrinking, but until they disappear, the major labels are in no position to eliminate any source of revenue.
Off

Muscle For Your Hustle: What Every DIY Musician Needs to Know

by Mrs. Gunn

This is great! Only .99 at 

http://www.lulu.com/product/ebook/muscle-for-your-hustle-what-every-diy-musician-needs-to-know/18485300

 

Off

Why? *updated!* *Are Many Musicians Wired to Not Do It Themselves?*

by Mrs. Gunn

There is a man, Bob Lefsetz, that writes a letter every day about the music industry. Actually, he writes two or three sometimes. He is an entertainment lawyer by trade and an industry insider, and EVERYONE reads his letters. I mean everyone, from Quincy Jones to the 70s british rocker indie band drummer. If you don’t read the letter, and you’re mentioned in it, someone will tell you about it. The thing I like about what he’s doing is that he is documenting and quantifying the change in the music industry. His letters of late have been reminiscent, nostalgic almost, but also harsh and truthful to current state of affairs. I really like what he wrote when he said that musicians do what they do because they have to. They just don’t have a choice.

Another thing he does is to sometimes, instead of sending his letter, to send out an email with responses (mailbag). This is the most fun part of all, is to see what other people said. Sometimes his readers are supportive, sometimes they correct him, sometimes they are just plain mad and angry and tell him off. They always add a new angle, though, to the discussion.

You can take all of this with a grain of salt. But as an educator, it is my responsibility to let you know what’s going on. And so, here is an excerpt from a Lefsetz letter, and then one person’s response.

****update – And below that, is another response from Michael Brandvold, msic marketeer ******

————————————————————————————-

Occupy EMI/Sony/Universal/Warner Brothers

The inefficiency is you.

[…]

Let’s start at the beginning. You want to get signed by a label. You think the employees love music, that they want to help you succeed.

The employees love money. Don’t blame them. Our whole country has undergone a philosophical change. It’s a race to the top. If underlings are sacrificed in the process, so be it. The label employees want to buy a house by the Park and vacation in a warm climate after traveling there by private jet. The bankers do it, why shouldn’t they?

So they only want to sign you if they see the potential for a huge return. A HUGE return. If you can make them a couple of bucks, they don’t care. It’s a matter of opportunity cost, their cash is better deployed elsewhere.

And since they’ve got so much money on the line, the executives running these labels want insurance. That insurance comes in the form of favored cowriters and producers. They don’t want you doing your own thing, it’s too risky. And they don’t want what isn’t easy to sell. If you don’t make Top Forty music, they just don’t care.

Used to be […] CDs sold for an inflated price and they were the only way the public could own the music. And people had to buy an album to hear the hit. Furthermore, the acts paid for recording costs and the labels owned the result, adding to their underlying value. A label is worth nothing without its copyrights.

But then came Napster.

Someone had to sacrifice.

And it certainly wasn’t going to be the executives.

They trimmed underlings, then they went for you, the acts. They wanted more. They didn’t want to share in the decline, they wanted a piece of all your income, because they built you. And people have been lining up to take this deal, out of ignorance, out of a desire to become rich, even though so few ultimately do.

The problem is you. The act. You want someone to do it for you. And the only people who can do so will [ruin] you. This is like a desperate person borrowing from the Mafia, the organization owns you for life, even if you repay the debt.

Why would you do this?

What is happening in the music business is no different from what is happening in the rest of the country.  [Heck,] Warner is owned by private equity. And EMI may be soon. As for Universal and Sony, their parents would unload the operations in an instant if they could. There’s just no one to buy.

[…]You’re like the worker who gets his union decertified, works ten hours a day at a feverish pace and then sees his job shipped overseas. At some point, you’ve got to say NO MAS. You’ve got to see that the odds are stacked against you.

hen [sic] you’ve got poor old Pete Townshend, railing that Apple has a responsibility to develop new talent. He’s lost in the sixties. That’s like saying Goldman Sachs has a responsibility to rebuild America, after raping and pillaging. The game has changed.

But technology does not only benefit private equity. It benefits you too. You can do it on your own. The public was intelligent enough to realize the labels were ripping them off, how come the artists can’t see the same thing? The fight against free music is the label’s, not the act’s. Recorded music revenue was always just a piece of the pie, but the game has changed. Now the biggest issue is getting people to hear your music, not pay for it. Why can’t acts understand this?

[…]

It’s just that simple.

And the company believes if you can ever make it, you’re gonna need them, their deep pockets and expertise.

The game is stacked against you. Please realize this.

It’s the responsibility of the acts to do it for themselves, with new people. It’s the only way out.

If you don’t save yourself, nobody will.

———————————————————————————————-

And one person’s reply—

———————————————————————————————-

Subject: Re: Occupy EMI/Sony/Universal/Warner Brothers

Bob, unfortunately, I get called everyday by yet another artist who wants me to shop his or her demo to a label. After asking so many of them the same question you did today – why?  – I have come to realize two things: one, most artists DO NOT want to do it themselves, maybe they just aren’t wired that way, maybe they’re lazy, maybe they think they need big money to make it really happen, maybe they are getting bad advice. Two, they don’t care about making a bad deal, they want to be FAMOUS.  They want fame so […] badly they will sign anything. I mean anything. They don’t believe guys like you and me when we tell them it’s stupid. They want to be FAMOUS!  Gaga did it an so can they. Katy Perry did it too. So can they.

When you show them Pomplamouse and The Weekend, and others, they just yawn.  How about Julia Nines on Kickstarter? Nah, They want to be in Spin and Rolling Stone and all of the other old media pubs whose time has come and gone. They want to be on NPR and in the NY Tines. They want to say “hey look at me, I made it Mom!”

If they have to be poor to get that, so be it. Maybe some day they can even be on Letterman or SNL. And as far as being poor, they don’t believe us, Gaga looks rich!

Bob, I just don’t know how to get through to these artists. As you have said before, they want to be famous but they want me to do all of the work. Just like they got the soccer trophy without ever scoring a goal. They want me to call in a favor or two and get them a record deal then get the label to do all of the work to make them famous. They aren’t willing to put in the time to build a fanbase, they want the label to do all of that work. Oh, yeah, and they want me to do it on a contingent basis, you know, my typical 5 or 10 percent. I say percent of what?  There won’t be an advance and you’ll never make any money. Let me show you how to do it yourself and we can both make some money and have long careers.

Any takers?

Todd Murphy
Entertainment Lawyer

————————————————————————————-

Are Many Musicians Wired to Not Do It Themselves?

From Michael Brandvold Marketing Blog,

http://michaelbrandvold.com/blog/2011/11/are-many-musicians-wired-to-not-do-it-themselves/

 

The letter below from Todd Murphy a music lawyer is taken from the November 2, 2011Bob Lefsetz email newsletter. The same day Bob emailed this out I met with Bob Bakerand Jack Conte from Pomplamoose. Interestingly enough, we made almost the exact same comments.

  • So many artists do not want to do it themselves.
  • That it must be wired into their DNA that they want a record deal.
  • And, they really just want to be famous more than anything else.
  • While chatting with Jack Conte from Pomplamoose he mentioned how even now he will go to a party or event and someone from outside the industry will often say, “well I hope someday that you make it.”

I think the ReverbNation survey that revealed 75% of artists still want to be signed speaks to how many artists still see the label deal as the goal.

Nobody is going to do it for you. Nobody is going to give you a big advance. You have to do the work. You have to manage your career. You have to be the boss.

Great letter Todd, I hope all musicians read this.

Off
Pages:12»